|
HOME | CONTACT US | SITE MAP | DISCLAIMER | LINKS |
||
![]() |
||
|
About
CAHCLS 2008
Meeting
2007 Meeting |
by Dr. John Kim The introduction of new
anti-retroviral therapies has resulted in tremendous advances in the
treatment of those infected with Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV).
However as with most drug therapies the development of resistance to these
drugs is a reality and remains a major reason for treatment failure. While
viral load measurements are useful as indirect tools in measuring the
emergence of drug resistance, these tests cannot directly determine if
drugs resistant mutations are present. There are two general
approaches used to measure HIV drug resistance: (a) phenotyping is
a direct measure of resistance which tests the level of sensitivity of a
patient’s HIV to particular drugs in cell culture. These tests however
are time consuming and costly and are only performed in specialized labs
and (b) genotyping, which uses DNA sequencing to determine if
specific genetic mutations are responsible for drug failure. In general
genotypic assays are considered to be more valuable in determining drug
failure rather than drug success. There are several methods of
performing DNA genotyping for the drug resistance including both
commercial and in-house methods. The DNA sequence that is obtained is
compared against one of several interpretative tables or algorithms. These
algorithms contain lists of mutations that are directly associated with
the development of drug resistance. In the summer of 2002 at the
annual meeting of HIV Clinical Lab Testing meeting, a consensus was
reached that supported the development and implementation of a quality
control/proficiency testing program for labs intending to use DNA
genotyping in the clinical care management of HIV-infected persons. This
program was subsequently developed by the National HIV/AIDS and
Retrovirology Laboratories of Health Canada and the British Columbia
Center for Excellence in HIV/AIDS. The first panel in this program was
sent to participants in November, 2002. The goal of this panel was to
first examine the quality of DNA sequencing prior to addressing
differences in drug resistance algorithms. One interesting finding from
this panel highlighted the importance of data management prior to sequence
submission (see report). The second panel was shipped in November 2003,
this time with the goal of examining differences in HIV testing algorithms
used by Canadian labs. The final report from this panel was not ready at
the time of this article submission but a review of the data showed an
extremely high correlation in the quality of the DNA sequence obtained by
participating labs. This is encouraging as it implies that any differences
in the ‘final’ drug resistance profile will most likely not be due to
poor quality DNA sequences and instead will be due to differences in the
interpretative algorithms used. The implementation of DNA
genotyping is still in its early stages. However, initial findings from
this program already indicate that the quality of DNA sequencing obtained
within labs involved in HIV clinical care management is extremely high and
that HIV infected Canadians will receive the highest level of care
possible with this new technology. For further information on: (a) this program please
contact: Dr.
John Kim Rick Galli (b) DNA genotyping (general) –
HIV_Drug_Resistance_No_Nonsense_Guide.pdf (c)
copy of the first report –
DR.A-02_report.report.May.2003.FINAL.pdf
March 04, 2004 |
|
|
Copyright 2003, Canadian Association of HIV Clinical Laboratory Specialists, All Rights Reserved. |
||